Pedro Sakamoto vs Tomas Lipovsek Puches Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L W W L L
Form
L L L L L L L L L LH2H: Sakamoto 2 - 1 Puches
They have played 7 sets in total, with Sakamoto winning 5 and Puches winning 2. The last match between Sakamoto and Puches was at the Florianopolis Challenger, 16-04-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Pedro Sakamoto getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pedro Sakamoto | 2 |
| Tomas Lipovsek Puches | 1 |
Florianopolis Challenger(16-04-2023)
6
1
6
2
| Sakamoto | Stats | Puches |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (9-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 350 | Ranking | 886 |
| 271 | Highest Rank | 250 |
| 31 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (434-333) | Career Total W/L | 55% (360-291) |
| $20,740 | Career Prize Money | $2,835 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
59
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 35 | Games Won | 23 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:20:12 | Average Match Time | 1:20:12 |
| 62% (96/154) | 1st Serve % | 57% (87/152) |
| 64% (61/96) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (48/87) |
| 72% (42/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (23/65) |
| 70% (14/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 53% (81/152) | Return Points Win % | 33% (51/154) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pedro Sakamoto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(8) 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Unknown Player
45%
(
17 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
90%
(
19 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
40%
(
30 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Ignacio Monzon
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Benjamin Torrealba
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Tomas Lipovsek Puches Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Parizzia
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Tepmahc
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Vincent
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
11
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (434/333) | Win/Loss | 55% (360/291) |
| 56% (973/759) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (796/692) |
| 53% (8375/7570) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6881/6548) |
| 51% (37/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (29/33) |
| 57% (395/295) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (331/257) |
| 50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1317 | Aces Total | 708 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 840 | Total Double Faults | 1368 |
| 1:8:45 | Average Match Time | 1:2:50 |
| 511.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 548.08 |
| 63% (22611/36061) | 1st Serve % | 64% (17677/27785) |
| 67% (15051/22611) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11077/17677) |
| 50% (6777/13457) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4611/10108) |
| 44% (1729/3921) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1499/3164) |
| 42% (15109/36389) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12143/27966) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (9/11) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (163/171) | Challenger W/L | 43% (74/98) |
| 63% (262/151) | Futures W/L | 60% (284/189) |
| 57% (423/744) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (345/636) |
| 64% (7/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (5/5) |
| 52% (96/183) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (63/120) |
| 47% (94/199) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (104/193) |
| 86% (440/377) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (347/305) |
| 14% (440/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (347/41) |
| 17% (327/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (304/51) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
